I guess it depends on your usage patterns. Once I went into fullscreen mode it was just like having a windows machine.įusion didn't have the same issue with fan speed, and Unity was more to my taste than coherence and would make the windows part go away and I could still use windows apps. What was nice about Parallels was the fullscreen mode adapted to my resolutions perfectly. It would also make the fans in my macbook stay all the time at full speed no less which was irritating. One is called Boot Camp while the other is called Parallels Desktop for Mac.The main difference between these two is that Boot Camp allows users to run Windows 'natively' from any Mac computer's hard disk while Parallels Desktop for Mac runs Windows inside a virtual machine while Mac OS X is running as the host. Every application that was open in the windows OS would add another dock icon, and when the application would close it wouldn't necessarily close. I had difficulty getting Parallels Coherence to work in a manner that didn't drive me nuts. It will work just like a windows machine.īetween Parallels and Fusion I would say that I personally like Fusion more. Boot camp has nothing to do with virtualization so it doesn't have any of the benefits of virtualization. I would say that I would only use boot camp if I bought a mac with the sole intention of never using mac OS X. You may want to try the workstation forum since forum is dedicated to installation and configuration of enterprise products. First, this is probably the wrong forum to get the answer that you want.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |